A model of Cummings and Foreman revisited

DOI10.1016/j.apal.2014.07.002zbMath1353.03063OpenAlexW2004159708MaRDI QIDQ741086

Spencer Unger

Publication date: 10 September 2014

Published in: Annals of Pure and Applied Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apal.2014.07.002

zbMATH Keywords

large cardinalsstationary reflectiontree propertyweak squares

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Consistency and independence results (03E35) Large cardinals (03E55) Other combinatorial set theory (03E05) Ordered sets and their cofinalities; pcf theory (03E04)

Related Items

The super tree property at the successor of a singular, The strong tree property and weak square, The ineffable tree property and failure of the singular cardinals hypothesis, Guessing models and the approachability ideal, The strong tree property and the failure of SCH, ITP, ISP, AND SCH

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Aronszajn trees and the successors of a singular cardinal
• Notes on singular cardinal combinatorics
• Reflecting stationary sets and successors of singular cardinals
• Making the supercompactness of \(\nu\) indestructible under \(\nu\)-directed closed forcing
• The tree property
• SQUARES, SCALES AND STATIONARY REFLECTION
• THE TREE PROPERTY UP TO א_ω+1
• Some Independence Results on Reflection
• Combinatorial Characterization of Supercompact Cardinals
• Reflecting stationary sets
• Strong tree properties for small cardinals
• Aronszajn trees and the independence of the transfer property
• The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy