Using arguments for making and explaining decisions

From MaRDI portal
Publication:835816

DOI10.1016/j.artint.2008.11.006zbMath1343.68219OpenAlexW2034735942MaRDI QIDQ835816

Henri Prade, Leila Amgoud

Publication date: 31 August 2009

Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2008.11.006




Related Items (43)

Argumentation update in YALLA (yet another logic language for argumentation)Preferences in artificial intelligenceSimilarity measures based on compiled argumentsAn approach to decision making based on dynamic argumentation systemsArgumentation based reinforcement learning for meta-knowledge extractionLogical limits of abstract argumentation frameworksEquivalence in logic-based argumentationGoal-Driven Structured Argumentation for Patient Management in a Multimorbidity SettingLattice point of view for argumentation frameworkExplainable acceptance in probabilistic and incomplete abstract argumentation frameworksA general approach to extension-based semantics in abstract argumentationExplaining black-box classifiers: properties and functionsOn the preferred extensions of argumentation frameworks: bijections with naive setsParameterized Complexity of Logic-based Argumentation in Schaefer’s FrameworkGradualness, uncertainty and bipolarity: making sense of fuzzy setsA framework for inherently interpretable optimization modelsFuzzy labeling semantics for quantitative argumentationArgumentation Framework Based on Evidence TheoryA practical account into counting Dung's extensions by dynamic programmingClassical logic, argument and dialecticOn the responsibility for undecisiveness in preferred and stable labellings in abstract argumentationCharacterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relationsA general framework for explaining the results of a multi-attribute preference modelDynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based methodOn bipolarity in argumentation frameworksPostulates for logic-based argumentation systemsPreferential reducts and constructs in robust multiple criteria ranking and sortingAlgorithms for decision problems in argument systems under preferred semanticsModeling time and valuation in structured argumentation frameworksBivariate models of optimism and pessimism in multi-criteria decision-making based on intuitionistic fuzzy setsEvaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphsAn argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge basesSolving Advanced Argumentation Problems with Answer Set ProgrammingA formal framework for deliberated judgmentOn Revising Argumentation-Based Decision Systems\textsc{Electre-Score}: a first outranking based method for scoring actionsEvaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semanticsPartial Semantics of ArgumentationA new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworksMulti-criteria decision-making methods with optimism and pessimism based on Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy setsGraded labellings for abstract argumentationRich preference-based argumentation frameworksUsing possibilistic logic for modeling qualitative decision: answer set programming algorithms



Cites Work


This page was built for publication: Using arguments for making and explaining decisions