A Bayesian approach to informal argument fallacies

DOI10.1007/s11229-005-5233-2zbMath1112.03303OpenAlexW2009532586MaRDI QIDQ857690

Ulrike Hahn, Mike Oaksford

Publication date: 20 December 2006

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-5233-2

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Related Items (5)

Logical fallacies as informational shortcuts ⋮ Logic, Reasoning, Argumentation: Insights from the Wild ⋮ A probabilistic analysis of argument cogency ⋮ A normative framework for argument quality: argumentation schemes with a Bayesian foundation ⋮ Credence for conclusions: a brief for Jeffrey's rule

Cites Work

• A logic for default reasoning
• Are there degrees of belief?
• Probability and logic.
• Probability, logic and the cognitive foundations of rational belief.
• Probabilistic argumentation systems. A new way to combine logic with probability.
• Abductive Inference
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: A Bayesian approach to informal argument fallacies