Pairwise comparisons for proportions estimated by pooled testing

DOI10.1016/j.jspi.2006.02.007zbMath1107.62056OpenAlexW2067219636MaRDI QIDQ872086

Joshua M. Tebbs, Melinda H. McCann

Publication date: 27 March 2007

Published in: Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2006.02.007

zbMATH Keywords

screening experimentsgroup testingmultiple comparisonssimultaneous inferenceHIV seroprevalence estimationJeffreys--Perks intervalsvector-transfer design

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing (62J15)

Related Items (9)

Nonparametric estimation of distributions and diagnostic accuracy based on group‐tested results with differential misclassification ⋮ Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for Comparing Binomial Parameters ⋮ Large-sample hypothesis tests for stratified group-testing data ⋮ Confidence intervals for the difference of two proportions estimated from pooled samples ⋮ Estimating disease prevalence using inverse binomial pooled testing ⋮ Classic group testing with cost for grouping and testing ⋮ Simultaneous Logit-Based Confidence Intervals for Odds Ratios in 2 × kClassification Tables with a Fixed Reference Level ⋮ Bayesian inference for disease prevalence using negative binomial group testing ⋮ Some limit results in estimation of proportion based on group testing

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Multiple Comparisons
• A Path Length Inequality for the Multivariate-t Distribution, With Applications to Multiple Comparisons
• A Multiple Comparison Procedure for Comparing Several Treatments with a Control
• Simple and Effective Confidence Intervals for Proportions and Differences of Proportions Result from Adding Two Successes and Two Failures
• A One-Sided Studentized Range Test for Testing Against a Simple Ordered Alternative
• Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for the Difference between Two Binomial Parameters for Use with Small Samples
• Screening for the Presence of a Disease by Pooling Sera Samples
• A Two-Stage Adaptive Group-Testing Procedure for Estimating Small Proportions
• Estimating ordered binomial proportions with the use of group testing
• Robustness of Group Testing in the Estimation of Proportions
• Use of Binomial Group Testing in Tests of Hypotheses for Classification or Quantitative Covariables
• On the informativeness and accuracy of pooled testing in estimating prevalence of a rare disease: Application to HIV screening

This page was built for publication: Pairwise comparisons for proportions estimated by pooled testing