Using well-structured transition systems to decide divergence for catalytic P systems
From MaRDI portal
Publication:872196
DOI10.1016/J.TCS.2006.11.021zbMath1111.68037OpenAlexW2064424797MaRDI QIDQ872196
Publication date: 27 March 2007
Published in: Theoretical Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2006.11.021
Related Items (10)
Properties of Membrane Systems ⋮ Systolic Automata and P Systems ⋮ Minimal probabilistic P systems for modelling ecological systems ⋮ Modeling dependencies and simultaneity in membrane system computations ⋮ Simulation of spatial P system models ⋮ Understanding and enhancement of internal clustering validation indexes for categorical data ⋮ Compositional semantics and behavioral equivalences for P systems ⋮ Compositional semantics of spiking neural P systems ⋮ AN OVERVIEW ON OPERATIONAL SEMANTICS IN MEMBRANE COMPUTING ⋮ Nadia Busi's publications
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Deterministic catalytic systems are not universal
- The power of catalysts and priorities in membrane systems
- Computing with membranes
- Computationally universal P systems without priorities: Two catalysts are sufficient
- Membrane computing. An introduction.
- Implementation and Application of Automata
- Well-structured transition systems everywhere!
This page was built for publication: Using well-structured transition systems to decide divergence for catalytic P systems