More on the inadmissibility of step-up

DOI10.1016/j.jmva.2006.02.002zbMath1107.62005OpenAlexW2001028264MaRDI QIDQ873613

Arthur Cohen, Harold B. Sackrowitz

Publication date: 29 March 2007

Published in: Journal of Multivariate Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2006.02.002

zbMATH Keywords

Schur convexityfalse discovery rate (FDR)classification riskfalse acceptance ratefinite action problemmultiple testing proceduresvector risk

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03) Hypothesis testing in multivariate analysis (62H15) Admissibility in statistical decision theory (62C15)

Related Items (7)

A smooth version of the step-up procedure for multiple tests of hypotheses ⋮ Some permutation symmetric multiple hypotheses testing rules under dependent setup ⋮ Admissible, consistent multiple testing with applications including variable selection ⋮ Multiple testing in ordinal data models ⋮ Smoothing of stepwise multiple testing procedures ⋮ Simultaneous control of false positives and false negatives in multiple hypotheses testing ⋮ A new multiple testing method in the dependent case

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Robbins, empirical Bayes and microarrays
• Multiple hypothesis testing in microarray experiments.
• Decision theory results for one-sided multiple comparison procedures
• Characterization of Bayes procedures for multiple endpoint problems and inadmissibility of the step-up procedure
• Some results on false discovery rate in stepwise multiple testing procedures.
• A Theory of some Multiple Decision Problems, I
• Detecting Differentially Expressed Genes in Microarrays Using Bayesian Model Selection
• Optimal Sample Size for Multiple Testing
• Operating Characteristics and Extensions of the False Discovery Rate Procedure

This page was built for publication: More on the inadmissibility of step-up