Comment on: ``A comparison of modified fuzzy weights of evidence, fuzzy weights of evidence, and logistic regression for mapping mineral prospectivity

DOI10.1007/s11004-014-9544-zzbMath1323.86034OpenAlexW2008916753MaRDI QIDQ887597

Helmut Schaeben

Publication date: 26 October 2015

Published in: Mathematical Geosciences (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-014-9544-z

zbMATH Keywords

missing datatargetingconditional independencemathematical modeling assumptionsparsimonious mathematical modelpotential modelingproper predictionssimple mathematical model

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Geostatistics (86A32) Fuzzy analysis in statistics (62A86)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• A note on the domination inequalities and their applications
• A mathematical view of weights-of-evidence, conditional independence, and logistic regression in terms of Markov random fields
• A comparison of modified fuzzy weights of evidence, fuzzy weights of evidence, and logistic regression for mapping mineral prospectivity
• Potential modeling: conditional independence matters
• Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates

This page was built for publication: Comment on: ``A comparison of modified fuzzy weights of evidence, fuzzy weights of evidence, and logistic regression for mapping mineral prospectivity