The Nash solution is more utilitarian than egalitarian
From MaRDI portal
Publication:893032
DOI10.1007/s11238-014-9477-5zbMath1378.91096OpenAlexW1964563403MaRDI QIDQ893032
Publication date: 13 November 2015
Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-014-9477-5
Cooperative games (91A12) Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models (91B26)
Related Items (8)
Egalitarian-utilitarian bounds in Nash's bargaining problem ⋮ Timing effect in bargaining and ex ante efficiency of the relative utilitarian solution ⋮ Conventional contracts, intentional behavior and logit choice: equality without symmetry ⋮ A tale of two bargaining solutions ⋮ Egalitarianism, utilitarianism, and the Nash bargaining solution ⋮ The Nash bargaining solution: sometimes more utilitarian, sometimes more egalitarian ⋮ On the axiomatic theory of bargaining: a survey of recent results ⋮ Rewarding moderate behavior in a dynamic Nash demand game
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Distributive justice and the Nash bargaining solution
- Twofold optimality of the relative utilitarian bargaining solution
- A mixed Bentham-Rawls criterion for intergenerational equity: theory and implications
- An axiomatization of the Nash bargaining solution
- Some formal models of grading principles
- The Bargaining Problem
- Distortion of Utilities and the Bargaining Problem
- Other Solutions to Nash's Bargaining Problem
- Proportional Solutions to Bargaining Situations: Interpersonal Utility Comparisons
- Fair Bargains: Distributive Justice and Nash Bargaining Theory
- Relative Utilitarianism
- Cooperation in Strategic Games Revisited*
- An ethical interpretation of the Nash choice rule
- Manipulation of preferences and relative utilitarianism
This page was built for publication: The Nash solution is more utilitarian than egalitarian
