Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks

DOI10.1016/J.JAL.2015.03.005zbMath1394.68363OpenAlexW2023831180MaRDI QIDQ901144

Ofer Arieli

Publication date: 23 December 2015

Published in: Journal of Applied Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2015.03.005

zbMATH Keywords

four-valued semanticsconstraint satisfactionabstract argumentationthree-valued semantics

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Many-valued logic (03B50)

Related Items (1)

A paraconsistent approach to deal with epistemic inconsistencies in argumentation

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• A logic for default reasoning
• The value of the four values
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Complete extensions in argumentation coincide with 3-valued stable models in logic programming
• A logical account of formal argumentation
• A QBF-based formalization of abstract argumentation semantics
• On the theory of inconsistent formal systems
• Conflict-Tolerant Semantics for Argumentation Frameworks
• On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
• Change in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Adding an Argument
• Natural 3-valued logics—characterization and proof theory
• Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks
• The well-founded semantics for general logic programs
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic
• Paraconsistent reasoning and preferential entailments by signed quantified Boolean formulae

This page was built for publication: Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks