Do \textit{ceteris paribus} laws exist? A regularity-based best system analysis

DOI10.1007/s10670-014-9645-6zbMath1329.03042OpenAlexW1992296044MaRDI QIDQ907915

Matthias Unterhuber

Publication date: 27 January 2016

Published in: Erkenntnis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9645-6

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10)

Related Items (2)

Ceteris paribus and ceteris rectis laws: content and causal role ⋮ Challenging Lewis's challenge to the best system account of lawhood

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Ceteris paribus and ceteris rectis laws: content and causal role
• An approach to default reasoning based on a first-order conditional logic: Revised report
• On first-order conditional logics
• \textit{Ceteris paribus} lost
• \textit{Ceteris paribus} laws: Classification and deconstruction
• In favor of laws that are not \textit{ceteris paribus} after all
• The new Tweety puzzle: arguments against monistic Bayesian approaches in epistemology and cognitive science

This page was built for publication: Do \textit{ceteris paribus} laws exist? A regularity-based best system analysis