Criteria for the assessment of random number generators
From MaRDI portal
Publication:916295
DOI10.1016/0377-0427(90)90330-3zbMath0703.65006OpenAlexW2035991700MaRDI QIDQ916295
Publication date: 1990
Published in: Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(90)90330-3
hyperplanesspectral testpseudorandom number generatorlattice structurelinear congruential generators
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- Calculation of Minkowski-reduced lattice bases
- The sub-lattice structure of linear congruential random number generators
- Uses and abuses of statistical simulation
- The lattice structure of pseudo-random vectors generated by matrix generators
- The lattice structure of pseudo-random number generators
- An Exhaustive Analysis of Multiplicative Congruential Random Number Generators with Modulus $2^{31} - 1$
- RSA and Rabin Functions: Certain Parts are as Hard as the Whole
- The Exact Determination of Rectangle Discrepancy for Linear Congruential Pseudorandom Numbers
- Notes on generalized Dedekind sums
- On the Distribution of Pseudo-Random Numbers Generated by the Linear Congruential Method. III
- Quasi-Monte Carlo methods and pseudo-random numbers
- Multiplicative Congruential Random Number Generators with Modulus 2 β : An Exhaustive Analysis for β = 32 and a Partial Analysis for β = 48
- Fourier Analysis of Uniform Random Number Generators
- RANDOM NUMBERS FALL MAINLY IN THE PLANES
- Pseudo-Random Numbers: The Exact Distribution of Pairs
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
This page was built for publication: Criteria for the assessment of random number generators