Assessing theories, Bayes style

DOI10.1007/s11229-006-9141-xzbMath1142.03310OpenAlexW2127386875MaRDI QIDQ928733

Franz Huber

Publication date: 11 June 2008

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/10853/1/Assessing_Theories%2C_Bayes_Style.pdf

zbMATH Keywords

ProbabilityConfirmationTheory evaluation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Probability and inductive logic (03B48)

Related Items (6)

Keynes's coefficient of dependence revisited ⋮ The degree of epistemic justification and the conjunction fallacy ⋮ Why are good theories good? Reflections on epistemic values, confirmation, and formal epistemology ⋮ Inductive logic ⋮ Assessing theories: the coherentist approach ⋮ On the role of explanatory and systematic power in scientific reasoning

Cites Work

• Metaconfirmation
• Iterated belief revision, reliability, and inductive amnesia
• The logic of theory assessment
• Inductive Inconsistencies
• Probabilities over rich languages, testing and randomness
• The Foundations of Causal Decision Theory
• An Examination of Information Theory
• I.—STUDIES IN THE LOGIC OF CONFIRMATION (I.)
• A purely syntactical definition of confirmation
• Is there a logic of confirmation transfer?
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Assessing theories, Bayes style