Unconditional exact tests for the difference of binomial probabilities-contrasted and compared

DOI10.1016/j.csda.2003.11.013zbMath1429.62074OpenAlexW2166805418MaRDI QIDQ957059

G. Skipka, Gudrun Freitag, Axel Munk

Publication date: 26 November 2008

Published in: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2003.11.013

zbMATH Keywords

likelihood ratio testFisher's exact testnon-inferiority trialsshifted null hypothesestherapeutic equivalenceunconditional exact \(p\)-values

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03)

Related Items

Efficient calculation of test sizes for non-inferiority ⋮ Contemporary frequentist views of the \(2\times 2\) binomial trial ⋮ Testing general hypotheses under binomial sampling: the two sample case-asymptotic theory and exact procedures ⋮ Testing noninferiority in three‐armed clinical trials based on likelihood ratio statistics ⋮ A numerical comparison of several unconditional exact tests in problems of equivalence based on the difference of proportions ⋮ An exact confidence set for two binomial proportions and exact unconditional confidence intervals for the difference and ratio of proportions

Uses Software

• PEG
• SG

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Choosing the optimal unconditioned test for comparing two independent proportions
• UMP(U)-Tests for a Binomial Parameter: A Paradox
• A Nonrandomized Unconditional Test for Comparing Two Proportions in 2×2 Contigency Tables
• Unconditional Non-Asymptotic One-Sided Tests for Independent Binomial Proportions When the Interest Lies in Showing Non-Inferiority and/or Superiority
• Raised conditional level of significance for the 2 × 2‐table when testing the equality of two probabilities
• THE MEANING OF A SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL