Determining sample size to evaluate and compare the accuracy of binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial disease verification
DOI10.1016/j.csda.2008.07.030zbMath1367.62301OpenAlexW2028237374WikidataQ60534575 ScholiaQ60534575MaRDI QIDQ961181
Juan de Dios Luna del Castillo, J. A. Roldán Nofuentes, M. A. Montero Alonso
Publication date: 30 March 2010
Published in: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2008.07.030
Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Medical applications (general) (92C50) Testing in survival analysis and censored data (62N03)
Related Items (3)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Computational methods for comparing two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial verification of disease
- Comparing two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias
- Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. (With comments and a rejoinder).
- Accounting for Nonignorable Verification Bias in Assessment of Diagnostic Tests
- Bayesian Sample Size Determination for Prevalence and Diagnostic Test Studies in the Absence of a Gold Standard Test
- Comparing Accuracies of Two Screening Tests in a Two-Phase Study for Dementia
- Maximum likelihood estimators of sensitivity and specificity corrected for verification bias
- Comparing the Likelihood Ratios of Two Binary Diagnostic Tests in the Presence of Partial Verification
- Risk of Error and the Kappa Coefficient of a Binary Diagnostic Test in the Presence of Partial Verification
- The Effect of Verification Bias in the Naïve Estimators of Accuracy of a Binary Diagnostic Test
- EM algorithm for comparing two binary diagnostic tests when not all the patients are verified
This page was built for publication: Determining sample size to evaluate and compare the accuracy of binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial disease verification
