Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics
From MaRDI portal
Publication:962903
DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2009.02.006zbMath1191.68671DBLPjournals/ijar/BaroniG09OpenAlexW2088885689WikidataQ57499577 ScholiaQ57499577MaRDI QIDQ962903
Massimiliano Giacomin, Pietro Baroni
Publication date: 7 April 2010
Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2009.02.006
Related Items (21)
Arguing about informant credibility in open multi-agent systems ⋮ Conflict-Tolerant Semantics for Argumentation Frameworks ⋮ Argumentation for Practical Reasoning: An Axiomatic Approach ⋮ On the Complexity of Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation Frameworks ⋮ Minimal hypotheses: extension-based semantics to argumentation ⋮ Merging operators on stratified belief bases equipped with argumentative inference ⋮ AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks ⋮ Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison ⋮ A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation ⋮ Stratified belief bases revision with argumentative inference ⋮ Generating possible intentions with constrained argumentation systems ⋮ Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method ⋮ On the input/output behavior of argumentation frameworks ⋮ Abstract argument games via modal logic ⋮ Structural Analysis of Extension-Based Argumentation Semantics with Joint Acceptability ⋮ On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance ⋮ A generalized proof-theoretic approach to logical argumentation based on hypersequents ⋮ Initial sets in abstract argumentation frameworks ⋮ A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency ⋮ A formal framework for deliberated judgment ⋮ An Application of Model Checking Games to Abstract Argumentation
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
- An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
- Comparing Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism
- On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
- A parameterised hierarchy of argumentation semantics for extended logic programming and its application to the well-founded semantics
- Logic Programming
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Strongly equivalent logic programs
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- An argument-based approach to reasoning with specificity
This page was built for publication: Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics
