Introduction to judgment aggregation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:969113
DOI10.1016/j.jet.2010.02.001zbMath1238.91061OpenAlexW3122990377MaRDI QIDQ969113
Publication date: 11 May 2010
Published in: Journal of Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27900/
Related Items (22)
Logic and majority voting ⋮ The birth of social choice theory from the spirit of mathematical logic: Arrow's theorem in the framework of model theory ⋮ An Abstract Algebraic Logic View on Judgment Aggregation ⋮ Representing voting rules in Łukasiewicz’s three-valued logic ⋮ Arrow on domain conditions: a fruitful road to travel ⋮ Arrow's decisive coalitions ⋮ A general method for deciding about logically constrained issues ⋮ Judgement aggregation in non-classical logics ⋮ The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory ⋮ Approximately classic judgement aggregation ⋮ The Condorcet jur(ies) theorem ⋮ The model-theoretic approach to aggregation: impossibility results for finite and infinite electorates ⋮ Neutrality and relative acceptability in judgment aggregation ⋮ A measure of distance between judgment sets ⋮ Judgment aggregation in search for the truth ⋮ Judgment aggregation in nonmonotonic logic ⋮ Logic based merging ⋮ Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation ⋮ Premise-based vs conclusion-based collective choice ⋮ Truth-tracking judgment aggregation over interconnected issues ⋮ Social Choice Theory ⋮ Aggregation of binary evaluations: a Borda-like approach
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review
- Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
- Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
- Order restricted preferences and majority rule
- The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions
- Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
- Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
- The Borda and Condorcet principles: Three medieval applications
- Judgment aggregation without full rationality
- Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case
- A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation
- Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation
- Abstract Arrowian aggregation
- Aggregation of binary evaluations
- Majority voting on restricted domains
- Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions
- The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation
- Justifiable group choice
- The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications
- Algebraic aggregation theory
- On the theory of aggregation
- A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions
- Arrow's theorem as a corollary
- The impossibility of a paretian rational: a Bayesian perspective
- The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation
- Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas
- Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case
- Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
- Aggregating disparate estimates of chance
- Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
- Democratic answers to complex questions -- an epistemic perspective
- The limits of epistemic democracy
- A generalised model of judgment aggregation
- Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework
- A Possibility Theorem on Majority Decisions
This page was built for publication: Introduction to judgment aggregation