The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:969119
DOI10.1016/j.jet.2010.01.011zbMath1238.91058OpenAlexW2107899320MaRDI QIDQ969119
Franz Dietrich, Philippe Mongin
Publication date: 11 May 2010
Published in: Journal of Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27896/
majority votingimpossibility theoremsjudgment aggregationdoctrinal paradoxpremiss-based and conclusion-based approach
Related Items
The logic of group decisions: judgment aggregation ⋮ Logic and majority voting ⋮ Philippe Mongin 1950--2020 ⋮ Introduction to Judgment Aggregation ⋮ Judgment aggregators and Boolean algebra homomorphisms ⋮ The median rule in judgement aggregation ⋮ An Abstract Algebraic Logic View on Judgment Aggregation ⋮ A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties ⋮ The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review ⋮ Judgment aggregation and the problem of tracking the truth ⋮ Judgement aggregation in non-classical logics ⋮ The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory ⋮ Scoring rules for judgment aggregation ⋮ Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others ⋮ Impossibility results for infinite-electorate abstract aggregation rules ⋮ Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. I: General agendas ⋮ Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. II: The premise-based approach ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ Aggregation of non-binary evaluations ⋮ A measure of distance between judgment sets ⋮ Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case ⋮ The Complexity Landscape of Outcome Determination in Judgment Aggregation ⋮ Judgment aggregation in search for the truth ⋮ Judgment aggregation in nonmonotonic logic ⋮ Introduction to judgment aggregation ⋮ Abstract Arrowian aggregation ⋮ The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation ⋮ Justifiable group choice ⋮ The rarity of consistent aggregators ⋮ Philippe Mongin (1950-2020) ⋮ Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation ⋮ Premise-based vs conclusion-based collective choice ⋮ Strategyproof judgment aggregation under partial information
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
- Judgment aggregation without full rationality
- Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case
- Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation
- Abstract Arrowian aggregation
- Aggregation of binary evaluations
- Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions
- The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation
- Justifiable group choice
- The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications
- Model theory
- Handbook of philosophical logic. Vol. 6
- Strong completeness theorems for weak logics of common belief
- The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation
- Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas
- Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
- Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
- The limits of epistemic democracy
- A generalised model of judgment aggregation
- Probability logic for type spaces