Comparing three ways to update Choquet beliefs

DOI10.1016/j.econlet.2009.12.035zbMath1203.91077OpenAlexW2147495536WikidataQ57933944 ScholiaQ57933944MaRDI QIDQ974180

Simon Grant, Jürgen Eichberger, David Kelsey

Publication date: 27 May 2010

Published in: Economics Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10871/12822

zbMATH Keywords

Choquet expected utilityneo-additive capacitygeneralized Bayesian updating

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Utility theory (91B16)

Related Items (13)

Objective rationality foundations for (dynamic) \(\alpha\)-MEU ⋮ Special issue on ambiguity and strategic interactions in honor of Jürgen Eichberger ⋮ Signaling probabilities in ambiguity: who reacts to vague news? ⋮ Feddersen and Pesendorfer meet Ellsberg ⋮ Ambiguity, optimism, and pessimism in adverse selection models ⋮ Ambiguous price formation ⋮ Agreement theorem for neo-additive beliefs ⋮ The emergence of ``fifty-fifty probability judgments through Bayesian updating under ambiguity ⋮ Irrationality and ambiguity in extensive games ⋮ Throwing good money after bad ⋮ A parsimonious model of subjective life expectancy ⋮ Agreeable trade with optimism and pessimism ⋮ Dynamic decision making under ambiguity: an experimental investigation

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities
• Updating ambiguous beliefs
• Updating Choquet beliefs
• Choice under uncertainty with the best and worst in mind: Neo-additive capacities
• Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity
• A Simple Axiomatization of Nonadditive Expected Utility
• Bayesian updating and belief functions
• Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping

This page was built for publication: Comparing three ways to update Choquet beliefs