Recollement and tilting complexes.
type: Item
instance of: scholarly article
title: Recollement and tilting complexes.
zbMATH Open document ID: 1038.16007
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4049(03)00072-0
author: Jun-Ichi Miyachi
published in: Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra
publication date: 2003-11-17T00:00:00Z
full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0203037
review text: In this very interesting paper the author studies compatibility between two constructions for derived categories of module categories. The first is the recollement of derived categories as it is defined by Beilinson-Bernstein and Deligne, and introduced into representation theory of algebras by Parshall and Scott. The second construction is the construction of equivalences between derived categories by tilting complexes due to Rickard and Keller. Recollement diagrams for module categories appear frequently using an idempotent \(e^2=e\) in an algebra \(A\), and then the category of \(A\)-modules is a recollement of the category of \(eAe\)-modules with the category of \(A/AeA\)-modules. Obviously, partial tilting complexes give rise to an idempotent and hence to a recollement diagram. The paper contains plenty of results. We can only describe some of the most striking. For a \(k\)-projective \(k\)-algebra \(A\) we denote by \(D(A)\) the derived category of complexes of \(A\)-modules. For an idempotent \(e\) of the \(k\)-projective \(k\)-algebra \(A\) the author constructs an unbounded complex \(\Delta_A(e)\) by some limit construction inducing a recollement of \(D(A)\) from \(D(eAe)\) and the derived category \(D_{A/AeA}(A)\) of complexes of \(A\)-modules with homology in \(A/AeA\)-modules. One of the main results of the paper is the characterization of the equivalence of the recollement of \(D(A)\) from \(D(eAe)\) and \(D_{A/AeA}(A)\) and the recollement of \(D(B)\) from \(D(fBf)\) and \(D_{B/BfB}(B)\) for another \(k\)-projective \(k\)-algebra \(B\) and an idempotent \(f\) of \(B\) in terms of very natural conditions on tilting complexes. Namely the tilting complex \(T\) over \(A\) is a direct sum of \(T_1\) and \(T_2\), \(f\) corresponds to the idempotent endomorphism of \(T\) given by projection on \(T_1\), \(T_1\) is formed by projective \(eA\)-modules, and the projection of \(P_1\) to \(D(eAe)\) is a tilting complex for \(eAe\). The behaviour of two-sided tiltin…
reviewed by: Alexander Zimmermann
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 16E05
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 18E30
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 20C05
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 16D90
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 16E30
zbMATH DE Number: 2005427
zbMATH Keywords: recollement diagrams
zbMATH Keywords: derived equivalences
zbMATH Keywords: derived categories
zbMATH Keywords: module categories
zbMATH Keywords: tilting complexes
zbMATH Keywords: symmetric algebras
MaRDI profile type: Publication
arXiv ID: math/0203037
cites work: Q3320507
cites work: Q4694943
cites work: Q3934557
cites work: Q3240881
cites work: Q3804882
cites work: Residues and duality. Lecture notes of a seminar on the work of A. Grothendieck, given at Havard 1963/64. Appendix: Cohomology with supports and the construction of the \(f^!\) functor by P. Deligne
cites work: TILTING COMPLEXES DEFINED BY IDEMPOTENTS
cites work: An elementary construction of tilting complexes
cites work: On \(t\)-structures and torsion theories induced by compact objects
cites work: A remark on tilting theory and DG algebras
cites work: Q4215784
cites work: Localization of triangulated categories and derived categories
cites work: The connection between the $K$-theory localization theorem of Thomason, Trobaugh and Yao and the smashing subcategories of Bousfield and Ravenel
cites work: Morita Theory for Derived Categories
cites work: Derived Equivalences As Derived Functors
cites work: Equivalences of derived categories for symmetric algebras.
cites work: Picard Groups for Derived Module Categories
cites work: Q3775700
OpenAlex ID: W2153714028
description: scientific article