On some mistaken beliefs about core logic and some mistaken core beliefs about logic
type: Item
instance of: scholarly article
title: On some mistaken beliefs about core logic and some mistaken core beliefs about logic
zbMATH Open document ID: 1455.03014
DOI: 10.1215/00294527-2018-0014
author: Neil Tennant
published in: Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic
publication date: 2018-12-21T00:00:00Z
full work available at URL: https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ndjfl/1539137244
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03B20
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03B47
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03B53
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03A05
zbMATH DE Number: 6996544
zbMATH Keywords: transitivity
zbMATH Keywords: natural deduction
zbMATH Keywords: synonymy
zbMATH Keywords: interdeducibility
zbMATH Keywords: deduction theorem
zbMATH Keywords: cut
zbMATH Keywords: methodological adequacy
MaRDI profile type: Publication
OpenAlex ID: W2897765117
cites work: Q4085699
cites work: What Negation is not: Intuitionism and '0=1'
cites work: The independence of connectives
cites work: Negation, absurdity and contrariety
cites work: Frege's content-principle and relevant deducibility
cites work: Q3144949
cites work: Cut for core logic
cites work: Aristotle's Syllogistic and Core Logic
cites work: Logic, Mathematics, and the A Priori, Part II: Core Logic as Analytic, and as the Basis for Natural Logicism
cites work: CUT FOR CLASSICAL CORE LOGIC
cites work: THE RELEVANCE OF PREMISES TO CONCLUSIONS OF CORE PROOFS
cites work: Rule-irredundancy and the sequent calculus for core logic
cites work: Why intuitionistic relevant logic cannot be a core logic
Wikidata QID: Q129109421
description: scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6996544