Deontic modals: why abandon the default approach
type: Item
instance of: scholarly article
title: Deontic modals: why abandon the default approach
zbMATH Open document ID: 1417.03065
author: André Fuhrmann
published in: Erkenntnis
publication date: 2018-03-29T00:00:00Z
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03A05
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03B45
zbMATH DE Number: 6854489
MaRDI profile type: Publication
full work available at URL: s10670-017-9879-1
OpenAlex ID: W2586272142
cites work: Q4343991
cites work: Q4530456
cites work: Contrary-to-duty obligations
cites work: Handbook of philosophical logic. Vol. 3.
cites work: An Analysis of some Deontic Logics
cites work: Norm Change in the Common Law
cites work: Moral dilemmas and nonmonotonic logic
cites work: Q4394892
cites work: Reasoning with Moral Conflicts
cites work: Defaults with priorities
cites work: Propositional calculus for contradictory deductive systems
cites work: Logic for Equivocators
cites work: Dyadic deontic detachment
cites work: Q5715109
cites work: Q4298367
cites work: Two approaches to the formalisation of defeasible deontic reasoning
cites work: A logic for default reasoning
cites work: Q3731564
DOI: 10.1007/S10670-017-9879-1
description: scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6854489