A study of Babylonian planetary theory. I: The outer planets
type: Item
instance of: scholarly article
title: A study of Babylonian planetary theory. I: The outer planets
zbMATH Open document ID: 1411.01013
author: Teije de Jong
published in: Archive for History of Exact Sciences
publication date: 2019-02-01T00:00:00Z
review text: The author addresses the question how Babylonian astronomers constructed the tables for the phenomena of the outer planets using what modern scholars call ``System A''. This model uses a ``step function'' to represent the variable velocity of the planets among the fixed stars. While these tables are well understood, we have no documentation how their inventors used the observational material contained in the \textit{Astronomical diaries} to arrive at the parameters of the tables. As the author says, ``How did the Babylonian astronomers proceed from observation to theory?'' The author gives a very clear overview of the Babylonian method to compute planetary phenomena, as applied to the outer planets. He then investigates how the Babylonians could have found the positions of the planets at their characteristic phenomena. In the \textit{Diaries}, such positions are related to fixed stars near the ecliptic. For observing the stations the difficulty is the slow motion of the planets near their stationary points; for the first and last visibilities, the brightness of the sky near these phenomena makes stars practically invisible so that the planet's distance from a star could not be observed. The author assumes that observations at the first station were used because the Babylonian model for Mars produces the best fit to reality for the first stations. For the other phenomena of Mars, the fit is much worse, in spite of a special correction introduced in some tables. The two-zone step function used for the System A model of Jupiter and Saturn delivers results accurate within the Babylonian observational possibilities. For the initial conditions of the planetary tables the author quotes a suggestion by P. Huber that four of the tables for Jupiter phenomena used observations from the years 108 and 109 of the Seleucid era to derive their initial conditions. The author then inspects to remaining fragments of a \textit{Diary} for this year and finds that the only suitable obser…
reviewed by: Hermann Hunger
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 01A17
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 70-03
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 70F15
zbMATH DE Number: 7010509
zbMATH Keywords: Babylonian astronomy
MaRDI profile type: Publication
OpenAlex ID: W2892548176
cites work: Episodes From the Early History of Astronomy
cites work: Some Dateless Computed Lists of Longitudes of Characteristic Planetary Phenomena from the Late-Babylonian Period
cites work: Two Lunar Texts of the Achaemenid Period from Babylon
cites work: The Babylonian Zodiac: Speculations on its invention and significance
cites work: Studies in Babylonian lunar theory. III: The introduction of the uniform zodiac
cites work: Q5164156
cites work: Studies on Babylonian goal-year astronomy. I: A comparison between planetary data in goal-year texts, almanacs and normal star almanacs.
cites work: A study of Babylonian observations of planets near normal stars
cites work: Some Atypical Astronomical Cuneiform Texts, II
cites work: A History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy
cites work: Some Atypical Astronomical Cuneiform Texts. I
cites work: Babylonian mathematical astronomy: Procedure texts
cites work: Q4110955
cites work: The late Babylonian normal and \textit{ziqpu} star text
cites work: Acronychal risings in Babylonian planetary theory
Wikidata QID: Q129246618
DOI: 10.1007/S00407-018-0216-0
description: scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7010509