A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation
type: Item
instance of: scholarly article
title: A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation
zbMATH Open document ID: 1443.68175
author: Andrea Cohen
author: Simon Parsons
author: Elizabeth I. Sklar
author: Peter McBurney
published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
publication date: 2018-05-11T00:00:00Z
full work available at URL: a-characterization-of-types-of-support-between-structured-arguments-and-their-relationship-with-support-in-abstract-argumentation(e5ffd163-3e91-4ee4-b3ff-e69ebd1cc21f).html
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 68T27
zbMATH DE Number: 6867768
zbMATH Keywords: argumentation
zbMATH Keywords: structured argumentation
zbMATH Keywords: abstract argumentation
zbMATH Keywords: support relation
describes a project that uses: OSCAR
MaRDI profile type: Publication
OpenAlex ID: W2785021480
Wikidata QID: Q110528587
cites work: A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
cites work: On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
cites work: A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
cites work: On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
cites work: An Algorithm for Computing Semi-stable Semantics
cites work: On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
cites work: Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
cites work: Change in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Adding an Argument
cites work: Coalitions of arguments: A tool for handling bipolar argumentation frameworks
cites work: Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
cites work: Backing and Undercutting in Defeasible Logic Programming
cites work: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
cites work: Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
cites work: Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation
cites work: A general account of argumentation with preferences
cites work: Properties and Complexity of Some Formal Inter-agent Dialogues
cites work: How to reason defeasibly
cites work: Q5283034
cites work: Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
cites work: Using argumentation to reason about trust and belief
cites work: DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified Assumptions
cites work: Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
DOI: 10.1016/J.IJAR.2017.12.008
Recommended article: Q5283034
Recommended article: An Axiomatic Approach to Support in Argumentation
Recommended article: An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support
Recommended article: Q4999253
Recommended article: On relating abstract and structured probabilistic argumentation: a case study
Recommended article: Q4631188
Recommended article: On Supported Inference and Extension Selection in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
Recommended article: Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations
Recommended article: Intrinsic argument strength in structured argumentation: a principled approach
description: scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6867768