Robust stability for a class of linear systems with time-varying delay and nonlinear perturbations
type: Item
instance of: scholarly article
title: Robust stability for a class of linear systems with time-varying delay and nonlinear perturbations
zbMATH Open document ID: 1154.93408
DOI: 10.1016/S0898-1221(04)90114-9
author: Qing-Long Han
publication date: 2005-03-08T00:00:00Z
review text: The author investigates the robust stability of uncertain systems with a single time-varying discrete delay \[ x'(t)=Ax(t)+Bx(t-h(t))+f(x(t),t)+g(x(t-h(t)),t),\tag{1} \] where \(f\) and \(g\) represent unknown perturbations and obtains a stability criteria. Numerical examples show significant improvements over some existing results. Reviewer's remarks: 1) Describing the system (1) the author should indicate the interval where the system is defined, i.e., on the semi-axis \([0,\infty)\). 2) The second line after formula (1) is formally correct, but usually it is written \(f(u,t)\), where \(u\in{\mathbb R}^n\), \(t\geq 0\), instead of \(f(x(t),t)\) that is superposition. 3) In the ``Definition 1'' it is not clear what is meant by \({\mathbb Z}=\{z\}\). 4) The conditions (6a), (6b) are not written in terms of solutions, but in terms of functions \(f\), \(g\), for instance in the form: \[ \|f(u,t)\|\leq\alpha\|u\|, \qquad \|g(u,t)\|\leq\beta\|u\|. \tag{(1)} \] 5) The same remark for inequalities (7a), (7b), in the line before the ``Corollary 1'', after formula (16), and also in the ``Example 1''. 6) Inequality (8): Maybe the author means a negative defined matrix? 7) I suggest to the author to indicate the dimensions of the matrices introduced in ``Theorem 1''. 8) The formulation of ``Lemma 1'' is not concise because there is not the phrase ``there exists'' after \(\gamma\) or after \(\omega\). In (9) instead matrix \(M\) is written the matrix \(Q\) that is not defined above, also \(r_M\), and \(r(t)\) were not defined before. 9) In page 1204, line 7 from bottom, instead ``are the solution of (8)'' I think is better to write ``satisfy (8)''. 10) I did not understand why in the ``Remark 3'' the constant \(h_M\) is linear?. 11) The second phrase from the beginning of Section 4. I did not understand why from bounded by norm \(f\), \(g\) follows the formula (17) (nonlinear equation became linear). 12) Next, in (18) is not explained what means the symbol \(\sigma_{\max}\), p…
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 93D09
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 93C23
zbMATH DE Number: 2142379
zbMATH Keywords: time-varying delay
zbMATH Keywords: robust stability
zbMATH Keywords: nonlinear perturbation
MaRDI profile type: Publication
cites work: Introduction to functional differential equations
cites work: Q3807934
cites work: Robust stability of uncertain time-delay systems
cites work: Robust exponential stability of uncertain systems with time-varying delays
cites work: Robust stability of uncertain time-delay systems and its stabilization by variable structure control
cites work: Stability of perturbed systems with time-varying delays
cites work: Computation of robust stability bounds for time-delay systems with nonlinear time-varying perturbations
cites work: New Lyapunov-Krasovskii functionals for stability of linear retarded and neutral type systems
cites work: Additional dynamics in transformed time-delay systems
cites work: Delay-dependent stability and H ∞ control: Constant and time-varying delays
cites work: A delay-dependent stability criterion for systems with uncertain time-invariant delays
cites work: Q5641059
cites work: Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory
cites work: A generalized Lyapunov theorem for descriptor system
cites work: Delay and its time-derivative dependent robust stability of time-delayed linear systems with uncertainty
published in: Computers & Mathematics with Applications
description: scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2142379