Is a small Monte Carlo analysis a good analysis? Checking the size, power and consistency of a simulation-based test
type: Item
instance of: scholarly article
title: Is a small Monte Carlo analysis a good analysis? Checking the size, power and consistency of a simulation-based test
zbMATH Open document ID: 1008.62018
published in: Statistical Papers
publication date: 2003-02-10T00:00:00Z
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 62F03
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 65C05
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 65C60
zbMATH DE Number: 1865972
author: Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza
MaRDI profile type: Publication
full work available at URL: s00362-002-0124-9
OpenAlex ID: W2605218479
cites work: Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root
cites work: An analysis of five simulation methods for determining the number of replications in a complex Monte Carlo study
cites work: Testing for nonstationary parameter specifications in seasonal time series models
cites work: Seasonal integration and cointegration
cites work: Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors
cites work: Q3766629
cites work: Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?
cites work: Testing for Common Trends
DOI: 10.1007/S00362-002-0124-9
description: scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1865972