The two-agent claims-truncated proportional rule has no consistent extension: a constructive proof
type: Item
instance of: scholarly article
title: The two-agent claims-truncated proportional rule has no consistent extension: a constructive proof
zbMATH Open document ID: 1255.91193
author: William Thomson
published in: Economics Letters
publication date: 2013-01-29T00:00:00Z
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 91B32
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 91A35
zbMATH DE Number: 6132242
zbMATH Keywords: conflicting claims
zbMATH Keywords: division rules
zbMATH Keywords: consistency
zbMATH Keywords: consistent extension
zbMATH Keywords: claims-truncated proportional rule
Wikidata QID: Q59972761
MaRDI profile type: Publication
full work available at URL: j.econlet.2007.04.022
OpenAlex ID: W2069571844
cites work: Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
cites work: A quadratic programming model for product configuration optimization
cites work: Bilateral comparisons and consistent fair division rules in the context of bankruptcy problems
cites work: The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems.
cites work: Claims problems and weighted generalizations of the Talmud rule
cites work: On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency
cites work: Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods
cites work: A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
cites work: Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
cites work: On Dividing an Amount According to Individual Claims or Liabilities
DOI: 10.1016/J.ECONLET.2007.04.022
description: scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6132242