`Ought' implies `can' against epistemic deontologism: beyond doxastic involuntarism
type: Item
instance of: scholarly article
title: `Ought' implies `can' against epistemic deontologism: beyond doxastic involuntarism
zbMATH Open document ID: 1474.03011
author: Charles Côté-Bouchard
published in: Synthese
publication date: 2021-11-25T00:00:00Z
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03A05
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03B42
zbMATH DE Number: 7433687
zbMATH Keywords: epistemic deontologism
zbMATH Keywords: `ought' implies `can'
zbMATH Keywords: epistemic justification
zbMATH Keywords: doxastic involuntarism
zbMATH Keywords: epistemic normativity
zbMATH Keywords: epistemic norms
zbMATH Keywords: belief
MaRDI profile type: Publication
full work available at URL: s11229-017-1531-8
OpenAlex ID: W2750368526
cites work: Deontic vs. nondeontic conceptions of epistemic justification
DOI: 10.1007/S11229-017-1531-8
description: scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7433687