Evaluating competing theories via a common language of qualitative verdicts
type: Item
instance of: scholarly article
title: Evaluating competing theories via a common language of qualitative verdicts
zbMATH Open document ID: 1360.03052
author: Wulf Gaertner
author: Nicolas Wüthrich
published in: Synthese
publication date: 2017-03-08T00:00:00Z
full work available at URL: Wüthrich Evaluating competing theories 2015.pdf
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03A10
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 91B14
zbMATH DE Number: 6692965
zbMATH Keywords: theory choice
zbMATH Keywords: social choice theory
zbMATH Keywords: scoring rules
zbMATH Keywords: Thomas S. Kuhn
zbMATH Keywords: epistemic values
MaRDI profile type: Publication
OpenAlex ID: W2116464345
cites work: Social choice and individual values
cites work: A theory of measuring, electing, and ranking
cites work: Q5392484
cites work: Q3323629
cites work: Q5395462
cites work: A general scoring rule
cites work: Formal utilitarianism and range voting
cites work: Arrow's theorem and theory choice
cites work: On Weights and Measures: Informational Constraints in Social Welfare Analysis
cites work: Q3741337
DOI: 10.1007/S11229-015-0929-4
Recommended article: Assessing theories: the coherentist approach
Recommended article: A multicriteria approach for analysis of conflicts in evidence theory
Recommended article: The logic of theory assessment
Recommended article: On comparison of theories by their contents
Recommended article: Q4837946
description: scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6692965