Why conclusions should remain single
type: Item
instance of: scholarly article
title: Why conclusions should remain single
zbMATH Open document ID: 1233.03016
author: Florian Steinberger
published in: Journal of Philosophical Logic
publication date: 2011-06-17T00:00:00Z
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03A05
zbMATH DE Number: 5909307
zbMATH Keywords: inferentialism
zbMATH Keywords: multiple conclusions
zbMATH Keywords: proof-theoretic arguments
MaRDI profile type: Publication
full work available at URL: s10992-010-9153-3
OpenAlex ID: W1993148732
cites work: Q4355889
cites work: Q4698611
cites work: What is Logic?
cites work: Q5632554
cites work: Meaning and proofs: on the conflict between classical and intuitionistic logic
cites work: Harmony and autonomy in classical logic
cites work: Q5483305
cites work: Q4159022
cites work: Rejection
cites work: Q3512158
cites work: Natural deduction and sequent calculus for intuitionistic relevant logic
cites work: Q4239945
DOI: 10.1007/S10992-010-9153-3
description: scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5909307