Credulous acceptance in high-order argumentation frameworks with necessities: an incremental approach
type: Item
instance of: scholarly article
title: Credulous acceptance in high-order argumentation frameworks with necessities: an incremental approach
zbMATH Open document ID: 1543.6835
author: Gianvincenzo Alfano
author: Andrea Cohen
author: Sebastian Gottifredi
author: Sergio Greco
author: Francesco Parisi
author: Guillermo R. Simari
published in: Artificial Intelligence
publication date: 2024-07-25T00:00:00Z
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 68T27
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 68T37
zbMATH DE Number: 7887418
zbMATH Keywords: formal argumentation
zbMATH Keywords: abstract argumentation
zbMATH Keywords: high-order interactions
zbMATH Keywords: credulous acceptance
zbMATH Keywords: argumentation dynamics
zbMATH Keywords: incremental computation
MaRDI profile type: Publication
cites work: Argumentation in artificial intelligence
cites work: Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
cites work: Explainable acceptance in probabilistic and incomplete abstract argumentation frameworks
cites work: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
cites work: Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
cites work: AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
cites work: Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches
cites work: Arguing about informant credibility in open multi-agent systems
cites work: Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations
cites work: Structure-Based Semantics of Argumentation Frameworks with Higher-Order Attacks and Supports
cites work: Incremental computation for structured argumentation over dynamic DeLP knowledge bases
cites work: On the input/output behavior of argumentation frameworks
cites work: On topology-related properties of abstract argumentation semantics. A correction and extension to ``Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method''
cites work: Splitting an Argumentation Framework
cites work: Q5414674
cites work: Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a survey
cites work: Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
cites work: Incremental Computation of Deterministic Extensions for Dynamic Argumentation Frameworks
cites work: Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
cites work: On the Semantics of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: A Logic Programming Approach
cites work: Handling support cycles and collective interactions in the logical encoding of higher-order bipolar argumentation frameworks
cites work: An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support
cites work: The first international competition on computational models of argumentation: results and analysis
cites work: Q3138899
cites work: Approximations for the maximum acyclic subgraph problem
cites work: Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks
cites work: Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
cites work: Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
cites work: Preference in Abstract Argumentation
cites work: A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
cites work: Q4585837
cites work: Q5039146
cites work: Dynamics in Argumentation with Single Extensions: Abstraction Principles and the Grounded Extension
cites work: Change in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Adding an Argument
cites work: Revising option status in argument-based decision systems1
cites work: Partial semantics of argumentation: basic properties and empirical
cites work: Toward incremental computation of argumentation semantics: a decomposition-based approach
cites work: The Matrix Approach for Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
cites work: Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks
cites work: Normal and strong expansion equivalence for argumentation frameworks
cites work: Q5282954
cites work: A general notion of equivalence for abstract argumentation
cites work: Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
cites work: Q4999253
cites work: Extended explanatory argumentation frameworks
cites work: On the equivalence between logic programming semantics and argumentation semantics
DOI: 10.1016/J.ARTINT.2024.104159
description: scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7887418