Are all linear paired comparison models empirically equivalent?
type: Item
instance of: scholarly article
title: Are all linear paired comparison models empirically equivalent?
zbMATH Open document ID: 0729.91018
DOI: 10.1016/0165-4896(92)90040-C
published in: Mathematical Social Sciences
publication date: 1992-01-01T00:00:00Z
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 91B06
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 91C05
zbMATH DE Number: 4207778
author: Hal S. Stern
MaRDI profile type: Publication
cites work: Q3661894
cites work: Q5812580
cites work: A paired comparison of pair comparisons
cites work: Q5598050
cites work: Probability models on rankings
cites work: Q3994362
cites work: Multivariate paired comparisons: The extension of a univariate model and associated estimation and test procedures
cites work: Solution of a Ranking Problem from Binary Comparisons
cites work: Multidimensional quantification of the data obtained by the method of paired comparison
cites work: Majorization, entropy and paired comparisons
cites work: Composition rules for probabilities from paired comparisons
cites work: Q3270181
cites work: A random utility family that includes many of the ‘classical’ models and has closed form choice probabilities and choice reaction times
cites work: Remarks about a paired comparison model
cites work: A continuum of paired comparisons models
cites work: The relationship between Luce's choice axiom, Thurstone's theory of comparative judgment, and the double exponential distribution
full work available at URL: 0165-4896(92)90040-c
OpenAlex ID: W2091413566
description: scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4207778