Relevant restricted quantification
type: Item
instance of: scholarly article
title: Relevant restricted quantification
zbMATH Open document ID: 1111.03020
author: Ross T. Brady
author: Graham Priest
author: Greg Restall
author: Jc Beall
author: A. P. Hazen
published in: Journal of Philosophical Logic
publication date: 2006-11-17T00:00:00Z
review text: The authors list a plausible set of inferences that should or should not hold for relevant (and more particularly paraconsistent) resticted quantification, before evaluating different options for interpreting: all alphas are betas, some alphas are betas and no alphas are betas. Standard options suffice for ``some'' and ``no'', but they conclude that for the ``all'' a new conditional is required. They define an enthymematic conditional which appropriately satisfies or fails to satisfy the listed inferences.
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03B47
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03B53
zbMATH DE Number: 5073727
zbMATH Keywords: relevant restricted quantification
zbMATH Keywords: paraconsistency
Wikidata QID: Q30052919
reviewed by: Martin W. Bunder
MaRDI profile type: Publication
full work available at URL: s10992-005-9008-5
OpenAlex ID: W2081606282
cites work: Q4662877
cites work: Q4405129
cites work: Classical relevant logics. I
cites work: An introduction to non-classical logic
cites work: How to be really contraction free
cites work: Four-valued semantics for relevant logics (and some of their rivals)
cites work: Q4805593
cites work: The American plan completed: Alternative classical-style semantics, without stars, for relevant and paraconsistent logics
DOI: 10.1007/S10992-005-9008-5
description: scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5073727