Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
type: Item
instance of: scholarly article
title: Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
zbMATH Open document ID: 1112.03305
author: Gabriella Pigozzi
published in: Synthese
publication date: 2006-12-20T00:00:00Z
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03A05
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03B42
zbMATH DE Number: 5080793
zbMATH Keywords: Judgment aggregation
zbMATH Keywords: Discursive dilemma
zbMATH Keywords: Discursive paradox
zbMATH Keywords: Belief merging
zbMATH Keywords: Fusion
MaRDI profile type: Publication
full work available at URL: s11229-006-9063-7
OpenAlex ID: W2121203835
cites work: Democratic answers to complex questions -- an epistemic perspective
cites work: Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
cites work: A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation
cites work: Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
cites work: Aggregation of binary evaluations
cites work: Q3107917
cites work: \(\text{DA}^2\) merging operators
cites work: Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework
cites work: Propositional belief base merging or how to merge beliefs/goals coming from several sources and some links with social choice theory
cites work: Q4246802
cites work: The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions
cites work: Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
cites work: Belief fusion: Aggregating pedigreed belief states
cites work: Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
cites work: Q5203719
cites work: On the Semantics of Arbitration
DOI: 10.1007/S11229-006-9063-7
description: scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5080793