Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective
type: Item
instance of: scholarly article
title: Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective
zbMATH Open document ID: 1346.68187
author: Henry Prakken
author: Giovanni Sartor
published in: Artificial Intelligence
publication date: 2015-12-21T00:00:00Z
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 68T27
zbMATH DE Number: 6522997
zbMATH Keywords: legal logic
zbMATH Keywords: legal reasoning
zbMATH Keywords: argumentation
zbMATH Keywords: AI and law
MaRDI profile type: Publication
full work available at URL: j.artint.2015.06.005
OpenAlex ID: W2340952989
cites work: Q5594592
cites work: Q5638252
cites work: Using background knowledge in case-based legal reasoning: A computational model and an intelligent learning environment
cites work: An executable specification of a formal argumentation protocol
cites work: Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems
cites work: Hierarchical representation of legal knowledge with metaprogramming in logic
cites work: On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance
cites work: Q3457206
cites work: Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
cites work: Introducing the Logic and Law Corner
cites work: A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values
cites work: Dynamic argument systems: A formal model of argumentation processes based on situation calculus
cites work: Deontic epistemic stit logic distinguishing modes of mens rea
cites work: Q5715677
cites work: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
cites work: Q4411900
cites work: Conditional entailment: bridging two approaches to default reasoning.
cites work: The carneades model of argument and burden of proof
cites work: Computing strong and weak permissions in defeasible logic
cites work: The many faces of counts-as: A formal analysis of constitutive rules
cites work: An Analysis of some Deontic Logics
cites work: Q4532194
cites work: Q5422030
cites work: Q4295371
cites work: Q4893675
cites work: Q5661849
cites work: A logic-based calculus of events
cites work: Stratification of normative systems with intermediaries
cites work: Question-begging in non-cumulative systems
cites work: Q4938866
cites work: Input/output logics
cites work: A different approach to deontic logic: Deontic logic viewed as a variant of dynamic logic
cites work: Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
cites work: Q4557982
cites work: A general account of argumentation with preferences
cites work: Belief revision and epistemology
cites work: Q3469076
cites work: Two approaches to the formalisation of defeasible deontic reasoning
cites work: Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation
cites work: Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
cites work: Q4394901
cites work: Changing legal systems: legal abrogations and annulments in Defeasible Logic
cites work: A computational theory of normative positions
cites work: A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
cites work: DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified Assumptions
DOI: 10.1016/J.ARTINT.2015.06.005
description: scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6522997