Strong pro-fibrations and ANR objects in pro-categories
type: Item
instance of: scholarly article
title: Strong pro-fibrations and ANR objects in pro-categories
zbMATH Open document ID: 1196.54040
author: Takahisa Miyata
published in: Topology and its Applications
publication date: 2010-08-27T00:00:00Z
review text: S. Mardesic and T. B. Rushing called a system map \(\mathbf f: \mathbf X \to \mathbf Y \) a \textsl{pro-fibration} whenever it satisfies a homotopy lifting property (HLP) for all spaces \(Z\). A \textsl{strong pro-fibration} satisfies the stronger (SHLP) which differs from the (HLP) by the requirement that the required lifting \(\tilde H: Z \times I \to X_\lambda\) of a homotopy \(H: Z \times I \to Y_\mu\) for appropriate indexes \(\lambda, \mu\), has the property that if \(H\) is stationary on some \(\{z\}\times I,\;z \in Z\), so is \(\tilde H\). This describes precisely the difference between Hurewicz fibrations and regular Hurewicz fibrations in the category \textbf{Top} so that one should probably call the author's \textsl{strong} pro-fibrations \textsl{regular} pro-fibrations. The second new concept of the author is that of an ANR object: A system \(\{X_\lambda, p_{\lambda \lambda'}, \Lambda\}\) is called an ANR object if for each \(\lambda \in \Lambda\) there exists a \(\mu\geq \lambda\) so that \(p_{\lambda\mu}\) factors over an ANR. Every ANR system is an ANR object. The converse holds for ANR towers in \textbf{pro-Top}. The full subcategory of \textbf{pro-Top} of ANR objects is called \(\mathcal{ANR}\). The author tries to verify a very weak form of the axioms of a closed model category for \(\mathcal{ANR}\) with his strong pro-fibrations as fibrations and some notion of weak equivalences. It turns out that of these four properties two are satisfied, one is satisfied under a restriction while one is probably hopeless. Moreover in a last section the author deals with Postnikov decompositions of ANR towers. Furthermore the author tries to apply his theory which works only on \textbf{pro-Top} or some versions of \textbf{pro-Top} (like the category of towers) to shape theory which in his case always means ordinary shape, where fibrations are very problematic, because everything occurs already on the homotopy level. Although he mentions in his references the wor…
reviewed by: Friedrich Wilhelm Bauer
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 54C56
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 54C55
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 55P55
zbMATH DE Number: 5775738
zbMATH Keywords: strong pro-fibration
zbMATH Keywords: pro-category
zbMATH Keywords: fibration category
zbMATH Keywords: ANR object
MaRDI profile type: Publication
full work available at URL: j.topol.2010.06.003
OpenAlex ID: W2095478802
cites work: Q4040829
cites work: Approximate fibrations
cites work: Q4084930
cites work: Q3341543
cites work: Q3665901
cites work: Approximate polyhedra, resolutions of maps and shape fibrations
cites work: Shape fibrations I
cites work: Shape fibrations. II
cites work: Q3959112
cites work: Fibrations in the Category of Absolute Neighborhood Retracts
cites work: Homotopical algebra
cites work: Q4863897
DOI: 10.1016/J.TOPOL.2010.06.003
Recommended article: Strong cofibrations and fibrations in enriched categories
Recommended article: Structure theory for pro-objects from an arbitrary category
Recommended article: On the Ganea strong category in proper homotopy
Recommended article: Pull-backs and fibrations in approximate pro-categories
Recommended article: Q4811761
Recommended article: Pro-categories in homotopy theory
Recommended article: Q3552036
Recommended article: Strong Homotopy Properads
Recommended article: \(A_{n}\) theory, L.S. category, and strong category
Recommended article: STRONGLY COPURE PROJECTIVE OBJECTS IN TRIANGULATED CATEGORIES
description: scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5775738