An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases
type: Item
instance of: scholarly article
title: An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases
zbMATH Open document ID: 1122.68116
author: Leila Amgoud
author: Souhila Kaci
published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
publication date: 2007-07-19T00:00:00Z
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 68T27
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 68T37
zbMATH DE Number: 5173146
zbMATH Keywords: argumentation
zbMATH Keywords: information merging
MaRDI profile type: Publication
cites work: Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
cites work: A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
cites work: Q4708904
cites work: Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
cites work: Possibilistic merging and distance-based fusion of propositional information
cites work: Fusion of possibilistic knowledge bases from a postulate point of view.
cites work: Q4236368
cites work: Q4296748
cites work: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
cites work: Argumentative logics: Reasoning with classically inconsistent information
cites work: Integration of weighted knowledge bases
cites work: Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
cites work: Q4789446
cites work: On inference from inconsistent premisses
cites work: On the Semantics of Arbitration
cites work: Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility
DOI: 10.1016/J.IJAR.2006.06.014
description: scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5173146