A remark on the sum of proximinal subspaces (Q1263772)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: A remark on the sum of proximinal subspaces |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4127831
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | A remark on the sum of proximinal subspaces |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4127831 |
Statements
A remark on the sum of proximinal subspaces (English)
0 references
1989
0 references
\textit{E. W. Cheney} and \textit{D. E. Wulbert} [Math. Scand. 24, 113-140 (1969; Zbl 0186.187)] asked the following question: if U and V are proximinal subspaces of a Banach space X and if \(U+V\) is closed, does it follow that \(U+V\) is proximinal? \textit{M. Feder} [J. Approximation Theory 49, 144-148 (1987; Zbl 0623.41036)] show that the answer to this question is negative. In the present paper the strengthening of this result is proved. In particular, is valid: Theorem 3. Let U be a Banach space. Then U is reflexive if and only if for any Banach space \(X\supseteq U\), V is proximinal in X and \(U+V\) is closed implies \(U+V\) is proximinal in X.
0 references
proximinal sets
0 references
sum of subspaces
0 references
0 references
0.9156065
0 references
0.90258634
0 references
0.8858212
0 references
0.8818202
0 references