Why it is computationally harder to reconstruct the past than to predict the future (Q1376490)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Why it is computationally harder to reconstruct the past than to predict the future |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1098517
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Why it is computationally harder to reconstruct the past than to predict the future |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1098517 |
Statements
Why it is computationally harder to reconstruct the past than to predict the future (English)
0 references
2 April 1998
0 references
This paper brings nothing new except a kind of physical interpretation of recent results concerning NP-hardness of computing exact bounds on solutions of linear interval equations. Considering the relationship between the vector of state variables \(x\) and the vector of ``future'' values \(y\) in the linear form \(y=Ax\), and assuming interval uncertainty of data, the authors obtain the results claimed in the title from the facts that given interval \(x\), computing \(y\) is polynomial-time whereas given interval \(y\), computing \(x\) is NP-hard.
0 references
linear interval equations
0 references
NP-hardness
0 references
exact bounds on solutions
0 references
0 references
0.7655861
0 references
0.7362841
0 references
0.73450065
0 references
0.7287701
0 references
0 references
0 references
0.7165177
0 references