Open-loop and closed-loop optimality in interpolation MPC (Q2776231)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Open-loop and closed-loop optimality in interpolation MPC |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1714425
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Open-loop and closed-loop optimality in interpolation MPC |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1714425 |
Statements
2 December 2002
0 references
model predictive control
0 references
affine nonlinear systems
0 references
terminal weight
0 references
receding horizon objective
0 references
explicit convergence constraint
0 references
open-loop predicted cost
0 references
closed-loop performance
0 references
terminal penalty
0 references
bilinear system
0 references
Open-loop and closed-loop optimality in interpolation MPC (English)
0 references
Model predictive control (MPC) algorithms for a class of input affine nonlinear systems are analysed and compared. Predicted future control trajectories are obtained by interpolating between an unconstrained optimal control law and a control law which locally stabilizes the constrained plant. Two techniques are discussed: addition of a terminal weight in the receding horizon objective, and inclusion of an explicit convergence constraint on closed-loop trajectories. The open-loop analysis is performed in order to reveal the relationship between these approaches. It is shown that the convergence constraint approach gives a smaller open-loop predicted cost and also achieves better closed-loop performance over the more conventional terminal penalty approach. The results of numerical simulation of a second-order single-input bilinear system with nonminimum-phase characteristics are provided.NEWLINENEWLINEFor the entire collection see [Zbl 0976.00019].
0 references