Algebras whose Tits form accepts a maximal omnipresent root. (Q2862134)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Algebras whose Tits form accepts a maximal omnipresent root. |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6226836
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Algebras whose Tits form accepts a maximal omnipresent root. |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6226836 |
Statements
14 November 2013
0 references
roots of Tits forms
0 references
weakly non-negative quadratic forms
0 references
maximal omnipresent roots
0 references
tilted algebras
0 references
tame algebras
0 references
exceptional index
0 references
dimension vectors of indecomposable representations
0 references
0.71739656
0 references
0 references
0.68249303
0 references
0.6413055
0 references
0.6377504
0 references
0.63607043
0 references
Algebras whose Tits form accepts a maximal omnipresent root. (English)
0 references
Let \(A=KQ\) be a hereditary algebra over an algebraically closed field \(K\). Then a fundamental theorem of \textit{V. G. Kac} [Invent. Math. 56, 57-92 (1980; Zbl 0427.17001)] states that the dimension vectors of the indecomposable representations are in one-to-one correspondence with the roots of an associated quadratic form \(q_A\) (i.e. those vectors \(v\in\mathbb Z^n\) with non-negative coordinates \(v(i)\) such that \(q_A(v)\leq 1\)).NEWLINENEWLINE If the algebra is no longer hereditary, one can still associate a quadratic form \(q_A\) to \(A=KQ/I\), the Tits form, but Kac's theorem is no longer true (see e.g. Example 1.5 (5) in the paper under review for a root \(v\) which is not realisable as the dimension vector of an indecomposable representation).NEWLINENEWLINE In the paper under review, the authors prove realisability for a certain class of algebras and dimension vectors: Namely under the assumptions that \(Q\) has neither oriented cycles nor double arrows and \(q_A\) admits a maximal omnipresent (real) root. Here real root means \(q_A(v)=1\), omnipresent that \(v(i)>0\) for all \(i\), and maximal that there is no other root \(w\) with \(w(i)\geq v(i)\) for all \(i\).NEWLINENEWLINE Furthermore, under the additional assumption that \(A\) is strongly simply connected they prove a weak form of Kac's theorem, namely that there is a one-to-one correspondence between the indecomposable sincere \(A\)-modules and the omnipresent roots of \(q_A\).
0 references