Deflation, projector preconditioning, and balancing in iterative substructuring methods: Connections and new results (Q2882796)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Deflation, projector preconditioning, and balancing in iterative substructuring methods: Connections and new results |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6031503
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Deflation, projector preconditioning, and balancing in iterative substructuring methods: Connections and new results |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6031503 |
Statements
7 May 2012
0 references
deflation
0 references
projector preconditioning
0 references
balancing
0 references
dual-primal finite element tearing and interconnecting
0 references
balancing domain decomposition by constraints
0 references
domain decomposition
0 references
iterative substructuring
0 references
incompressible elasticity problem
0 references
numerical results
0 references
linear elasticity
0 references
0.8946198
0 references
0.89431447
0 references
0.88503855
0 references
0.87885183
0 references
0.8776833
0 references
0 references
Deflation, projector preconditioning, and balancing in iterative substructuring methods: Connections and new results (English)
0 references
Projector preconditioning, also known as the deflation method, as well as the balancing preconditioner are applied to the dual-primal finite element tearing and interconnecting (FETI-DP) and balancing domain decomposition by constraints (BDDC) methods in order to create a second, independent coarse problem. This may help to extend the parallel scalability of classical FETI-DP and BDDC methods without the use of inexact solvers and may also be used to improve the robustness, e.g., for almost incompressible elasticity problems. Connections of FETI-DP methods applying a transformation of basis using a larger coarse space with a corresponding FETI-DP method using projector preconditioning or balancing are pointed out. It is then shown that the methods have essentially the same spectrum. Numerical results for compressible and almost incompressible linear elasticity are provided. The sensitivity of the projection methods to an inexact computation of the projections is numerically investigated and a different behavior for projector preconditioning and the balancing preconditioner is found.
0 references