Using relative statistics and approximate disease prevalence to compare screening tests

DOI10.1515/IJB-2016-0017WikidataQ55332849 ScholiaQ55332849MaRDI QIDQ6632763

Craig K. Abbey, Frank W. Samuelson

Publication date: 5 November 2024

Published in: The International Journal of Biostatistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

prevalenceratiosscreeningdiagnosticrelative statistics

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• A Proposed Design and Analysis for Comparing Digital and Analog Mammography
• Comparing disease screening tests when true disease status is ascertained only for screen positives
• False Discovery Rate–Adjusted Multiple Confidence Intervals for Selected Parameters

This page was built for publication: Using relative statistics and approximate disease prevalence to compare screening tests

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6632763)