Deducing planning variables from experimental arm trajectories: Pitfalls and possibilities (Q1820734)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Deducing planning variables from experimental arm trajectories: Pitfalls and possibilities |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3995509
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Deducing planning variables from experimental arm trajectories: Pitfalls and possibilities |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3995509 |
Statements
Deducing planning variables from experimental arm trajectories: Pitfalls and possibilities (English)
0 references
1987
0 references
This paper investigates whether endpoint Cartesian variables or joint variables better describe the planning of human arm movements. For each of the two sets of planning variables, a coordination strategy of linear interpolation is chosen to generate possible trajectories, which are to be compared against experimental trajectories for best match. Joint interpolation generates curved endpoint trajectories called N- leaved roses. Endpoint Cartesian interpolation generates curved joint trajectories, which however can be qualitatively characterized by joint reversal points. Though these two sets of planning variables ordinarily lead to distinct predictions under linear interpolation, three situations are pointed out where the two strategies may be confused.
0 references
biological motor control
0 references
Cartesian variables
0 references
joint variables
0 references
planning of human arm movements
0 references
linear interpolation
0 references
N-leaved roses
0 references
0.84146523
0 references
0.83492935
0 references
0.8311281
0 references
0.82316995
0 references