Respecting priorities versus respecting preferences in school choice: when is there a trade-off?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6665669
DOI10.1016/J.GEB.2024.08.012MaRDI QIDQ6665669
Li Chen, Estelle Cantillon, Juan Sebastián Pereyra
Publication date: 17 January 2025
Published in: Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)
Cites Work
- Two simple variations of top trading cycles
- Misrepresentation and stability in the marriage problem
- Co-ranking mates: assortative matching in marriage markets
- Efficient assignment respecting priorities
- A tale of two mechanisms: Student placement
- On the uniqueness of stable marriage matchings
- Mutually best matches
- On cores and indivisibility
- On stable and efficient mechanisms for priority-based allocation problems
- What matters in school choice tie-breaking? How competition guides design
- Self-selection in school choice
- Efficiency and stability under substitutable priorities with ties
- Preference profiles for efficiency, fairness, and consistency in school choice problems
- Acyclicity and singleton cores in matching markets
- On two competing mechanisms for priority-based allocation problems
- How well do structural demand models work? Counterfactual predictions in school choice
- Gale-Shapley Stable Marriage Problem Revisited: Strategic Issues and Applications
- The Economics of Matching: Stability and Incentives
- THE EQUITABLE TOP TRADING CYCLES MECHANISM FOR SCHOOL CHOICE
- Efficient Resource Allocation on the Basis of Priorities
- College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage
- Unique stable matchings
This page was built for publication: Respecting priorities versus respecting preferences in school choice: when is there a trade-off?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6665669)